About
I know what the evaluation record must look like to support a higher rating.
Michael Isenhour — PMP Certified Program Manager, Contracting Officer Representative, and former federal source selection board evaluator.
Companies rarely lose major federal contracts because their proposal was unclear.
They lose because the written record does not justify a higher rating.
In competitive procurements, proposals are not compared side by side. Each proposal stands on its own merits and is evaluated strictly against the stated requirements. Evaluators must document whether the proposal demonstrates measurable benefit, credible risk reduction, and operational realism. A higher rating cannot be assumed. It must be supported by evidence.
- If impact is not proven, it is discounted.
- If risk is described but not controlled, confidence drops.
- If cost savings are claimed but not explained, they are not credited.
When evaluators hesitate, the rating does not move.
I have served on government source selection boards as an evaluator during recompete decisions. That experience shapes how I assess proposals today. I understand how strengths are scrutinized, how weaknesses are documented, how consensus is formed, and how ratings must be defended in writing.
I have also managed multimillion-dollar portfolios, overseen a $300M firm fixed price services contract, developed independent government cost estimates and performance work statements, executed contract modifications, and evaluated contractor performance through CPARS as a PMP-certified Program Manager and Contracting Officer Representative.
Before submission, that determination should be clear.
An independent evaluation reviews your proposal the way a government team will. Each requirement is examined. Claimed strengths are tested for measurable impact. Risk mitigation is assessed for practical execution. Cost savings are evaluated for realism.
This is not writing assistance. It is a disciplined assessment of how your proposal is likely to be evaluated — before the government reaches its conclusion.
When the award is significant, assumptions are expensive. Clear judgment is not.
“Mike has a knack for working under pressure to deliver results on time and within budget. He is adept at risk management, issue resolution, and issue management. He has been a valuable asset to my team and a proactive and effective project manager. He's a great resource!!”
Chelsea Roberts (Meggitt)
Federal Contracting SME
Free download
Get your Why You Lost checklist
The 10 evaluator-side reasons technically capable companies get scored down — and the specific language that fixes each one. Sent straight to your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time. You’ll also be first to hear when we open access to the app. See our privacy policy.